Most legislation deals with bites after the fact. If we want to prevent all bites, there is only one sure way and that is to ban all dogs. That is of course as unrealistic as trying to prevent bites by enacting breed specific legislation. Full text Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (722K), or click on.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL), is any law,. Pros and cons. Proponents of BSL usually say protecting the public from dog breeds viewed as having 'inherent' tendencies to aggressive behavior will eliminate dog-human altercations. In general, much of the public believes that dangerous dogs must be of a certain breed, such as larger guardian breeds, or smaller terrier breeds--and much of.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans and other animals.States should not have breed-discriminatory laws because it is a form of discrimination, it affects public safety, and dogs of the banned breed are sometimes innocent.
Every step towards breed-specific legislation and breed banning is two steps away from solving the true issue of owner education and responsibility. “I am completely and absolutely opposed to breed ban and breed-specific legislation,” states Dr. Ha. The amount of energy spent on trying to exterminate breeds of dogs is not only entirely out of proportion to their actual risk, but also a.
Although multiple communities have been studied where breed-specific legislation has been enacted, no convincing data indicates this strategy has succeeded anywhere to date (Klaassen et al., 1996; Ott et al., 2007; Rosado, 2007). Conversely, studies can be referenced that evidence clear, positive effects of carefully crafted, breed-neutral laws (Bradley, 2006). It is, therefore, the ASPCA’s.
Breed-specific legislation (BSL) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans and other animals. However, the problem of dangerous dogs will not be remedied by the “quick fix” of breed-specific laws—or, as they should truly be called, breed-discriminatory laws.
Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), is a blanket term for laws that either ban or regulate certain breeds completely in hopes of reducing dog attacks. Now this may sound like a really good idea to some people, but if one takes the time to sit down and read what this law will actually be doing, it is clear that the law is trying to get the public to target one certain breed. This does not help.
This is why Blue Cross is calling on the government to repeal breed specific legislation. Section one of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 outlaws four types of dog based on their physical appearance, regardless of whether or not the dog has ever behaved dangerously. This legislation has been ineffective at preventing dog attacks. In fact, between March 2005 and February 2015, hospital admissions.